Who is the earliest Biblical figure that historians have evidence actually existed?

Determining the historical existence of biblical figures is a complex and debated topic. While many biblical figures are considered important within religious traditions, the historical evidence for their existence varies. It's essential to note that historical evidence often becomes scarcer the further back in time one goes.

Among the figures mentioned in the Bible, some scholars argue that individuals like King David and Solomon may have historical roots. However, the evidence for their existence is not conclusive, and debates among historians persist.

King David is often considered a key figure in the biblical narrative, and some archaeological findings, such as the Tel Dan Stele (an inscription from the ancient city of Dan), include references to the "House of David." While this provides some support for the existence of a Davidic dynasty, the specifics remain a matter of scholarly discussion.

Similarly, King Solomon, known for his wisdom and building projects, is mentioned in the Bible. Archaeological excavations in the region have uncovered structures that some scholars associate with Solomon's reign, such as the gates and walls of Megiddo. However, the interpretation of archaeological findings is not always straightforward.

It's important to approach these discussions with an awareness that archaeological and historical evidence from ancient times can be limited, and interpretations may vary among scholars. The Bible, as a religious and literary text, contains narratives that serve various purposes, including moral, religious, and cultural teachings, and not all elements are necessarily meant to be interpreted as straightforward historical accounts.